Latest Blog Posts
Posted in Uncategorized, celebrity, game on August 18th, 2008
Need for Speed goes Undercover November 18
Maggie Q to star in live-action sequences in EA’s next installment of underground street racer for 360, PS3, PS2, PSP, Wii, DS, and PC.
The Transporter isn’t typically positioned as a high-water mark for which a product should aspire to. However, EA CEO John Riccitiello did just that during an investor conference in June, saying that the next Need for Speed game, Need For Speed Undercover, would be a “much better game” than Need for Speed ProStreet. Rather than focus exclusively on racing, the game would sport a stronger mission structure and “narrative hook” akin to the 2002 Jason Statham action flick.
Today, EA officially announced Need for Speed Undercover for the Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, PlayStation 2, PlayStation Portable, Wii, Nintendo DS, PC, and mobile devices. True to Riccitiello’s word, the street racer will feature a number of live-action cutscene sequences, and the publisher has secured the talents of starlet Maggie Q (Balls of Fury, Mission Impossible III) to lead its efforts. Ms. Q will play the role of Agent Chase Linh, who oversees players as they infiltrate the underground racing scene to upend an international crime syndicate.
As noted by Riccitiello, Undercover will feature gameplay that resembles 2005’s NFS: Most Wanted, emphasizing car chases, underground racing, and highway battles. The shift in direction, according to Riccitiello, was possible because EA’s Vancouver-based Black Box is no longer being “tortured” by a one-year development cycle. GameSpot will have its first impressions of the retooled racer next Wednesday.
Need for Speed Undercover is expected to drift onto retail shelves in North America on November 18, with a European release following on November 21.
View all comments
Posted in tech news on August 16th, 2008
Researchers Craft Multimedia PasswordsJohn E. Dunn
Aug 14, 2008 10:23 pmCanadian researchers have come up with a novel solution to the perennial problem of stupidly insecure passwords — create secure ones using images, MP3 files or videos.
Mohammad Mannan and P.C. van Oorschot of Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, have come up with ObPwd (object-based password), a way of creating complex, random passwords from SHA-1-based hashes generated using a range of image and sound file types as input.
Instead of using the easy-to-guess name of a pet cat as the password — easy meat for a dictionary cracker — the user could use a picture of the same animal to generate something sophisticated enough to withstand even the best password cracking tools. Getting round the technology would mean having to have access to the specific image or file from which the password was generated.
“Users keep a record (memorized or written) of a pointer to their content used in generating each password. Users can write down the password in a `secure’ place, or re-create it from the content when needed,” write the authors in a public paper on the concept.
The end user’s mental effort is transferred from having to remember a string of text to simply having to know which file was used to create the password, they point out. ObPwd is advanced enough for the researchers to have released the software in beta form as an add-on tool for Mozilla, and as a stand-alone Windows XP utility.
The concept has some limitations. They recommend using files above a certain size — 30 bytes - to create long enough passwords, but not so large that the generation process is slowed down. This rules out using large video files, unless the password is based on only part of the file. They also warn against creating passwords from public material, such as pictures on a Facebook page or common image files. The password from a given file will always be the same, making secure possession of file imperative.
The program could, however, be secured using what is called a ’salt’, a PIN number used to protect the program’s output from a given image, though this would obviously detract from the simplicity of the ObPwd idea.
Obpwd should not be confused with the much simpler idea of using images themselves as pictorial passwords or mnemonics, which has been around for some years. Numerous systems exist to do the latter, including the UK-based PicturePIN.
View all comments
Posted in tech news on August 15th, 2008
10 Worst Web glitches of 2008 (so far)
By Rafe Needleman – August 15, 2008 6:00 AM PDTWe have been reminded several times lately that Web 2.0 is in noway a synonym for “reliable.” Major services have crashed. Big product launches have fizzled. Users have raised their collective fists in the air. What’s going on? Is the Web crumbling? Well, no, it’s not. But users’ expectations are rising, and Web companies often get themselves into trouble by promising far more than they can deliver.
Here’s the timeline of offline:Amazon S3 (Also: Google App Engine)
When: February 15 (Amazon); June 17 (Google)
What happened: These massive infrastructure services, Amazon’s S3 especially, underpin many Web 2.0 companies. When they go down, big sites go down. When the sites go down, they lose money.
Corporate coping behavior: Amazon CTO Werner Vogels banished to the lecture circuit to explain why S3 is still more reliable than any servers you could run yourself.
The damage: Companies forced to re-consider their reliance on “cloud computing.”
Twitter
When: April, May, June. July too? Who cares? What happened: Twitter began to get unreliable. It’s up, then it’s down. Repeat.
Corporate coping behavior: During the bad spells, Twitter turns off key features of the service — like access from Twitter helper apps, or the “replies” tab on the site — to decrease the load. Twitter also buys the search engine Summize, which adds a new level of utility to the service.
The damage: Twitter was becoming part of the social fabric of the technology community. When it began to get flakey, marquee users abandoned the service and fled to rivals like Friendfeed. The problems appear to have been resolved, but the damage may never be repaired.
Firefox
When: June 17
What happened: Mozilla announced the release data of the Firefox 3.0 and its goal to get a million downloads on that day. When the day comes, the download doesn’t work. The downloads start up later, and Mozilla goes on not just to meet its download goal but utterly crush it.
Corporate coping behavior: Mozilla changes “Download Day” to “The 24-hour Period that Starts When We Say it Does.”
The damage: Temporary embarrassment, which is overshadowed by insane success.
Amazon
When: June 17
What happened: Amazon went offline for a big part of the U.S. workday. Millions of users had to go back to work.
Corporate coping behavior: Mad scramble to fix. What did you expect?
The damage: Estimated at $16,000 a minute. But long-term damage to the company is negligible (unlike the S3 outage).
Google Docs
When: July 8
What happened: Online productivity apps went offline, stranding users’ files in the cloud.
Corporate coping behavior: Apology. Google has offline support (Google Gears) for an increasing number of its online apps. Which is fine, if you remember to set it up before the next outage.
The damage: Credibility. Online apps are being pitched by companies like Google as credible replacements to traditional apps like Microsoft Office. Outages like this shake users’ already tenuous faith in the reliability of services that hold their most important data files.
MobileMe
When: July 10
What happened: Apple launched its 3G iPhone with a new data sync service to replace .Mac. Sadly, it didn’t work. For many users, key services like e-mail wouldn’t update.
Corporate coping behavior: Jobs berates his staff in public; Apple gives subscribers 30 days of free service.
The damage: Poor uptake of the service, many disgruntled users, negative halo effect on the iPhone.
Cuil
When:July 27
What happened: Google scientist leaves Google, builds competitive search engine. At launch, it sucks. By the time it’s working as advertised, nobody’s paying attention anymore.
Corporate coping behavior: Company claims millions of users are so anxious to dump Google that they overload the new engine. Begs for time.
The damage: You only get one chance to make a first impression. Cuil’s growth will be seriously clipped by its botched launch.
Scrabble
When:July 29
What happened: After finally getting off the stick and suing the much-loved Scrabulous off of Facebook, Hasbro releases its own online Scrabble app on the social platform. It crashes.
Corporate coping behavior: Scrabble owner Hasbro claims that hackers killed the service. No surprise: As Caroline McCarthy reported, “if you just look at the Scrabble application wall, it’s pretty clear that there are a few people who are angry enough at Hasbro and EA to want to sabotage the game.”
The damage: What’s a seven-letter word for “global acrostic withdrawl?”
Gmail (Also: Hotmail)
When: August 12 (Gmail); February 26 (Hotmail)
What happened: OMG, Gmail is down. And unlike with client-based e-mail (Outlook), when your Web mail is offline, you can’t even read the old stuff sitting in your inbox.
Corporate coping behavior: Google apologies, knows users will be back.
The damage: In the recent Gmail outage, upset users flocked to Twitter to complain. Miraculously, Twitter stayed up, despite a crushing load of hundreds of tweets a second from disgruntled Gmail users.
Netflix
When: August 14 and March 24.
What happened: Undisclosed troubles fell all 55 Netflix shipping centers. Twice. Users don’t get their discs.
Corporate coping behavior: Netflix plans to refund fees to affected users, and reminds them they can watch streaming Netflix on their PC or Roku box. Although the company refuses to use the word “fallback” to describe this benefit.
The damage: Netflix customers have to watch old DVDs, live TV, Tivo, Unbox, Hulu… Wait a minute, do we really need Netflix?
And don’t forget…
It’s just August. There’s plenty of time left in the year for more Web 2.0 disaster.
View all comments
Posted in tech news on August 13th, 2008

PC WORLD
Microsoft Is Giving Up on Windows
Steve Bass
learns that Microsoft has had it with Windows.Steve Bass
Aug 13, 2008 2:00 am
It’s true: Microsoft has confirmed that it’s abandoning Windows as we know it. Cagey as ever, the Microsofties won’t say when it’ll happen, but they have talked a little bit about what the next OS is going to look like–or not look like.
Microsoft code-named the project Midori. As best I can figure, it’s cloud computing: Everything, including applications and data, is on the Internet.
What Exactly Is Midori?
My colleague Elizabeth Montalbano, with the IDG News Service, tried making some sense of it in “Microsoft Prepares for End of Windows With Midori” and Erik Larkin, our crackerjack OS and Web guy, has plenty to say in “Cloud Computing, Microsoft’s Midori, and the End of Windows.” There are also details–and speculation–in an SDTimes piece, “Microsoft’s plans for post-Windows OS revealed.”
Midori for Linux?
One of my smarter-than-me buddies, Gary F., told me that Linus Torvalds worked on something called Midori a few years ago, an embedded Linux for mobile devices: “I doubt Microsoft would ever release something that could be traced back to Linux, but if I recall correctly, Transmeta’s Midori had some rudimentary ‘cloud computing’ features vaguely similar to Microsoft’s Midori.”
View all comments
Posted in tips, video, you tube video on August 12th, 2008

Or even did you try to download files from other major sites who host videos for free like Google, Break.com, iFilm, Putfilm and ect….Yes you can download these files from using special softwares I saw most of them free. So why we need to use any other method than using traditional software using method ?Because most of those softwares free but they are very slow when we going to download files from those video hosting sites.So I suggest you to use this method now I’m going to show you because even you don’t want to download those free ware and install them and this is daman fast than them you can use your download manager for this case..Firs go to YouTube and chooce the video you want
Click on it ( now this will open a new page with your selected video )
Copy the url in your address bar
Now you want to go to KEEPVID…CLICK HEREPaste Url in address bar there
Click download
Then the display will be DOWNLOAD - flv for low quality video or mp4 for high quality video, the choice is yours.
View all comments
Posted in Uncategorized, tech news on August 11th, 2008


Firefox 3 vs. Opera 9.5
18 Jun, 2008 Posted by Tal in Applications, Internet, Reviews, Security
Over the last few years, Mozilla has taken quite a large slice of the internet browser market. Its community-developed Firefox, is now already in its 3rd version, which has been released today. Firefox has been praised for its security features, and often declared safer than Microsoft’s Internet Explorer by security experts. The new Firefox boasts, in addition to a comprehensive redesign of its looks and a host of new features, several new security enhancements which promise to make it even more secure.
But Firefox isn’t the only player in the web browser game. Another recent player is Opera. Actually, it’s not new, per se. Several years ago, before Firefox’s breakthrough into the market, Opera was a paid browser. Later, Opera released an ad-supported free version, and then finally released a fully free version, without any advertising whatsoever, in order to try and capture a larger market share. The release of various beta versions of Firefox 3 took most of the attention of the media, however, and the news about the release of the new 9.5 version of Opera was overlooked. Along with an update of its appearance, the addition of several new gadgets and features, and speed optimization, Opera added a security feature which is very similar to one offered by Firefox 3; both of these enhancements will be described later in this article.
So, is Opera a real player in the browser scene? Can it beat the unbeatable? Let’s find out.
Firefox 3 is a major update to the successful Firefox 2. The interface has been redesigned, and even with the default skin it looks pretty good, and has sleek animations. Notable interface updates include: a redesigned Download Manager that includes an information bar in the browser window; the ability to tag bookmarks; the ability to save open tabs for the next session; Add-On download manager (download add-ons without visiting Mozilla’s site); and many more features. Also, it has undergone tweaking to enhance its speed, and Mozilla claims that it’s now twice as fast as Firefox 2 when loading applications like Gmail. However, I didn’t notice any visible improvement. Major new security features include complex anti-phishing tools - Firefox 3 will hide the content of web pages that are suspected forgeries and warn you when entering pages that distribute malware, using an online database of known sites that was created by Google and StopBadware.org. Also, Firefox 3 gives you easy access to SSL certificates (which are presented in an easy-to-read manner) by clicking near the address bar with your mouse.
Firefox 3 with its new History Search feature, which searches addresses by keywords.
Opera’s new feature list is not as impressive, but it does offer several new features and gadgets, such as the Quick Find, which allows you to search for a website that you have visited over the last few days. Other new features include the ability to swap links and favorites between your Opera cellphone browser and your PC Opera, and a new browser engine that’s supposed to be much quicker than the old one. Opera also added a major security feature, which is similar to that offered by Firefox: the Fraud & Malware protection uses an online database to find a list of ‘bad sites’ and protect you from going to them. Unlike Firefox, that list is maintained by HauteSecure, which is a professional company, and the database is supported by the user community (description of ‘bad sites’, addition of new entries, etc).
But how do previous versions of Firefox and Opera rank against current versions, in terms of security? You’d be surprised by the results. According to Secunia, as of May 2008, Firefox 2.x.x has 23 security vulnerabilities, out of which 3 remain unfixed. Compared to this, Opera 9.x has 14 security vulnerabilities, with all fixed. Internet Explorer ranks last, with 9 out of 28 vulnerabilities that remain unfixed.
As for performance, previous versions of Firefox were known for their heavy resource usage, especially when operating with many extensions. Load times took literally tens of seconds, and the memory consumption often went above the 100mb mark on my machine. Firefox 3 claims to have improved this, but in fact, I had higher memory consumption than I had in Firefox 2. With 5 open websites (in tabs) and not a lot of extensions, Firefox 3 takes up more than 160mb of memory, which is a significant amount. With the same pages open, however, Opera used only 98mb of memory.
So, Opera proves to be a better performer than Firefox, and it feels faster while loading pages, too. To confirm this, I ran 2 different tests to check the rendering speed of web pages (that is, how fast a browser processes a certain type of code). First, I ran the CSS Benchmark Test by nontroppo. I ran the test 5 times on each browser. Firefox 3 took an average of 269ms to complete the test, while Opera excelled at 178ms average. Internet Explorer came last with 434ms average. Next, I ran the Javascript test by Celtic Kane. Again, I did 5 tests with each browser - Firefox again was second with 303ms, Opera first with 203ms, and Internet Explorer last with a whooping 1931ms, which is almost 2 seconds. On startup, Opera felt a bit faster than Firefox, but that wasn’t too big of a difference.
Opera’s interface, with the new Quick Dial feature.
When it comes to interface, it’s very much a personal choice. Opera doesn’t have community developed extensions, but many extensions that are common on Firefox, such as Adblock, are already built into Opera, which contributes to its speed. I also liked some of Opera’s cool features, such as the Speed Dial feature (when opening a new tab, instead of a blank page you get a choice of 9 of your most favorite pages to choose from), and the built-in IRC client.
In summary, unless you are an extension addict, you should give Opera 9.5 a try. It will surprise you. It’s faster and lighter than Firefox, and promises to be more secure. Unfortunately, unlike Firefox, Opera doesn’t have the huge database of community-made extensions, which is one of its on
View all comments
Posted in appz, game on August 11th, 2008

THE WORLD FACTBOOK . . . The World Factbook is the reliable and extremely popular source of information on all the nations of the world. It provides up-to-date, valuable data for more than 250 countries and territories in a concise, well-organized format wherever and whenever you want. Each country entry has its own high-resolution, full-color map and flag picture. The World Factbook also provides interesting chapters for our changing planet, oceans and parts of the world whose status has not yet been resolved (e.g., West Bank, Spratly Islands). Topics addressed include natural resources, industries, GDP, religion, ethnic groups, legal system and much more. Key data are grouped under the headings of introduction/background, geography, people, government, economy, communications, transportation, military, transnational issues. The World Factbook is a must-have application for those who possess a curiosity or concern about the rapidly changing world in which we live.
DOWNLOAD HERE
if download does’nt start, copy paste this url to your browser address bar. Use MOZILLA FIREFOX or OPERA 9.5..IE is blah blah..thnkx.. http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/7/16/2005769/jDictionary.Mobile.The.World.FactBook.v3.4.S60.Java.Cracked-BiNPDA.jar
View all comments
Posted in Uncategorized, movie synopsis, movie trailer on August 10th, 2008
Download HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE 10mb file
Synopsis
Voldemort is tightening his grip on both the Muggle and wizarding worlds and Hogwarts is no longer the safe haven it once was. Harry suspects that dangers may even lie within the castle, but Dumbledore is more intent upon preparing him for the final battle that he knows is fast approaching. Together they work to find the key to unlock Voldemort’s defenses and, to this end, Dumbledore recruits his old friend and colleague, the well-connected and unsuspecting bon vivant Professor Horace Slughorn, whom he believes holds crucial information. Meanwhile, the students are under attack from a very different adversary as teenage hormones rage across the ramparts. Harry finds himself more and more drawn to Ginny, but so is Dean Thomas. And Lavender Brown has decided that Ron is the one for her, only she hadn’t counted on Romilda Vane’s chocolates! And then there’s Hermione, simpering with jealously but determined not to show her feelings. As romance blossoms, one student remains aloof. He is determined to make his mark, albeit a dark one. Love is in the air, but tragedy lies ahead and Hogwarts may never be the same again.
And yet…
As in all wars, life goes on. Sixth-year students learn to Apparate - and lose a few eyebrows in the process. The Weasley twins expand their business. Teenagers flirt and fight and fall in love. Classes are never straightforward, though Harry receives some extraordinary help from the mysterious Half-Blood Prince.
So it’s the home front that takes center stage in the multilayered sixth installment of the story of Harry Potter. Here at Hogwarts, Harry will search for the full and complex story of the boy who became Lord Voldemort - and thereby find what may be his only vulnerability.
View all comments