You are viewing magnumblasts44's blog on G-Blogs

Log in | Create a Blog | Go to Dashboard | Learn more about G-Blogs | View Next Blog

W_A_R_S_H_O_C_K - BETA nyak yak yak

dumping ground of toxic waste. BIOHAZARD WARNING !!!!

Browsing according to Category

OPERA 9.6-Final FOR PC NOW AVAILABLE

Snatched from my WARSHOCK blogspot.I have been using Opera browsers, both the PC and the mobile-symbian 8.65 and mini opera versions for a long time now. Now this is the browser I turn to when there’s topic or any item that needs speed searching and when blog posting. Although I have not yet given the 9.6 a complete run, their usual speed dial, anti-phising security, customize panels are retained in this version. The cool new feature, Previewed Feeds, really works with my Feed Burner.Here is what’s new in Opera 9.6Expanded Opera Link
Opera lets you take your favorite search engines and the browser history you enter wherever you go. Opera Link also synchronizes notes taken in your Opera browser, your bookmarks, Speed Dial and personal bar.

Optimized Opera Mail
Stuck with a slow connection? Our built-in e-mail client, Opera Mail, now includes “low-bandwidth mode” to retrieve mails even faster when bandwidth is limited.

Prioritized e-mail
Opera Mail has two new ways to manage e-mail conversations. Keep an eye on important threads and contacts by following them, or ignore less important threads and contacts with a single click.

Increased speed:
Opera 9.6 improves the quick responsiveness and page loading of Opera 9.5.

Previewed feeds
Look before you feed. Now you can see an RSS feed’s content before subscribing to it or even bookmarking it. Opera gives you a clean, multi-column preview for each RSS feed so you know what to expect before you subscribe.

Improved fluency
Opera is pleased to add support for Indonesian, Ukrainian, Estonian, Hindi, Telugu, and Tamil languages.

To find out more about Opera 9.6 just visit  Opera Homepage

NEW OPERA BROWSER 9.52 now available


About Opera 9.5:

New browser engine

Opera made the fastest browser in the world even faster with superior support for Web standards. Opera 9.5 is quicker to start, faster at loading Web pages and better at running your favorite Web applications.

-More than 2x faster than Opera 9.2 in rendering JavaScript and HTML
-Faster handling of third party plug-ins
-Much faster start up time
-Superior support for Web standards

GO TO OPERA DOWNLOAD PAGE OPERA 9.52 DOWNLOAD

RESEARCHERS CRAFT MULTIMEDIA PASSWORDS

Researchers Craft Multimedia PasswordsJohn E. Dunn
Aug 14, 2008 10:23 pmCanadian researchers have come up with a novel solution to the perennial problem of stupidly insecure passwords — create secure ones using images, MP3 files or videos.

Mohammad Mannan and P.C. van Oorschot of Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, have come up with ObPwd (object-based password), a way of creating complex, random passwords from SHA-1-based hashes generated using a range of image and sound file types as input.

Instead of using the easy-to-guess name of a pet cat as the password — easy meat for a dictionary cracker — the user could use a picture of the same animal to generate something sophisticated enough to withstand even the best password cracking tools. Getting round the technology would mean having to have access to the specific image or file from which the password was generated.

“Users keep a record (memorized or written) of a pointer to their content used in generating each password. Users can write down the password in a `secure’ place, or re-create it from the content when needed,” write the authors in a public paper on the concept.

The end user’s mental effort is transferred from having to remember a string of text to simply having to know which file was used to create the password, they point out. ObPwd is advanced enough for the researchers to have released the software in beta form as an add-on tool for Mozilla, and as a stand-alone Windows XP utility.

The concept has some limitations. They recommend using files above a certain size — 30 bytes - to create long enough passwords, but not so large that the generation process is slowed down. This rules out using large video files, unless the password is based on only part of the file. They also warn against creating passwords from public material, such as pictures on a Facebook page or common image files. The password from a given file will always be the same, making secure possession of file imperative.

The program could, however, be secured using what is called a ’salt’, a PIN number used to protect the program’s output from a given image, though this would obviously detract from the simplicity of the ObPwd idea.

Obpwd should not be confused with the much simpler idea of using images themselves as pictorial passwords or mnemonics, which has been around for some years. Numerous systems exist to do the latter, including the UK-based PicturePIN.

10 WORST WEB GLITCHES of 2008 (so far)

10 Worst Web glitches of 2008 (so far)
By Rafe Needleman – August 15, 2008 6:00 AM PDTWe have been reminded several times lately that Web 2.0 is in noway a synonym for “reliable.” Major services have crashed. Big product launches have fizzled. Users have raised their collective fists in the air. What’s going on? Is the Web crumbling? Well, no, it’s not. But users’ expectations are rising, and Web companies often get themselves into trouble by promising far more than they can deliver.
Here’s the timeline of offline:Amazon S3 (Also: Google App Engine)
When: February 15 (Amazon); June 17 (Google)
What happened: These massive infrastructure services, Amazon’s S3 especially, underpin many Web 2.0 companies. When they go down, big sites go down. When the sites go down, they lose money.
Corporate coping behavior: Amazon CTO Werner Vogels banished to the lecture circuit to explain why S3 is still more reliable than any servers you could run yourself.
The damage: Companies forced to re-consider their reliance on “cloud computing.”

Twitter
When: April, May, June. July too? Who cares? What happened: Twitter began to get unreliable. It’s up, then it’s down. Repeat.
Corporate coping behavior: During the bad spells, Twitter turns off key features of the service — like access from Twitter helper apps, or the “replies” tab on the site — to decrease the load. Twitter also buys the search engine Summize, which adds a new level of utility to the service.
The damage: Twitter was becoming part of the social fabric of the technology community. When it began to get flakey, marquee users abandoned the service and fled to rivals like Friendfeed. The problems appear to have been resolved, but the damage may never be repaired.

Firefox
When: June 17
What happened: Mozilla announced the release data of the Firefox 3.0 and its goal to get a million downloads on that day. When the day comes, the download doesn’t work. The downloads start up later, and Mozilla goes on not just to meet its download goal but utterly crush it.
Corporate coping behavior: Mozilla changes “Download Day” to “The 24-hour Period that Starts When We Say it Does.”
The damage: Temporary embarrassment, which is overshadowed by insane success.

Amazon
When: June 17
What happened: Amazon went offline for a big part of the U.S. workday. Millions of users had to go back to work.
Corporate coping behavior: Mad scramble to fix. What did you expect?
The damage: Estimated at $16,000 a minute. But long-term damage to the company is negligible (unlike the S3 outage).

Google Docs
When: July 8
What happened: Online productivity apps went offline, stranding users’ files in the cloud.
Corporate coping behavior: Apology. Google has offline support (Google Gears) for an increasing number of its online apps. Which is fine, if you remember to set it up before the next outage.
The damage: Credibility. Online apps are being pitched by companies like Google as credible replacements to traditional apps like Microsoft Office. Outages like this shake users’ already tenuous faith in the reliability of services that hold their most important data files.

MobileMe
When: July 10
What happened: Apple launched its 3G iPhone with a new data sync service to replace .Mac. Sadly, it didn’t work. For many users, key services like e-mail wouldn’t update.
Corporate coping behavior: Jobs berates his staff in public; Apple gives subscribers 30 days of free service.
The damage: Poor uptake of the service, many disgruntled users, negative halo effect on the iPhone.

Cuil
When:July 27
What happened: Google scientist leaves Google, builds competitive search engine. At launch, it sucks. By the time it’s working as advertised, nobody’s paying attention anymore.
Corporate coping behavior: Company claims millions of users are so anxious to dump Google that they overload the new engine. Begs for time.
The damage: You only get one chance to make a first impression. Cuil’s growth will be seriously clipped by its botched launch.

Scrabble
When:July 29
What happened: After finally getting off the stick and suing the much-loved Scrabulous off of Facebook, Hasbro releases its own online Scrabble app on the social platform. It crashes.
Corporate coping behavior: Scrabble owner Hasbro claims that hackers killed the service. No surprise: As Caroline McCarthy reported, “if you just look at the Scrabble application wall, it’s pretty clear that there are a few people who are angry enough at Hasbro and EA to want to sabotage the game.”
The damage: What’s a seven-letter word for “global acrostic withdrawl?”

Gmail (Also: Hotmail)
When: August 12 (Gmail); February 26 (Hotmail)
What happened: OMG, Gmail is down. And unlike with client-based e-mail (Outlook), when your Web mail is offline, you can’t even read the old stuff sitting in your inbox.
Corporate coping behavior: Google apologies, knows users will be back.
The damage: In the recent Gmail outage, upset users flocked to Twitter to complain. Miraculously, Twitter stayed up, despite a crushing load of hundreds of tweets a second from disgruntled Gmail users.

Netflix
When: August 14 and March 24.
What happened: Undisclosed troubles fell all 55 Netflix shipping centers. Twice. Users don’t get their discs.
Corporate coping behavior: Netflix plans to refund fees to affected users, and reminds them they can watch streaming Netflix on their PC or Roku box. Although the company refuses to use the word “fallback” to describe this benefit.
The damage: Netflix customers have to watch old DVDs, live TV, Tivo, Unbox, Hulu… Wait a minute, do we really need Netflix?

And don’t forget…
It’s just August. There’s plenty of time left in the year for more Web 2.0 disaster.

MICROSOFT Is Giving Up on WINDOWS … OPERA wallpaper

PC WORLD
Microsoft Is Giving Up on Windows
Steve Bass
learns that Microsoft has had it with Windows.Steve Bass
Aug 13, 2008 2:00 am

It’s true: Microsoft has confirmed that it’s abandoning Windows as we know it. Cagey as ever, the Microsofties won’t say when it’ll happen, but they have talked a little bit about what the next OS is going to look like–or not look like.

Microsoft code-named the project Midori. As best I can figure, it’s cloud computing: Everything, including applications and data, is on the Internet.

What Exactly Is Midori?

My colleague Elizabeth Montalbano, with the IDG News Service, tried making some sense of it in “Microsoft Prepares for End of Windows With Midori” and Erik Larkin, our crackerjack OS and Web guy, has plenty to say in “Cloud Computing, Microsoft’s Midori, and the End of Windows.” There are also details–and speculation–in an SDTimes piece, “Microsoft’s plans for post-Windows OS revealed.”
Midori for Linux?

One of my smarter-than-me buddies, Gary F., told me that Linus Torvalds worked on something called Midori a few years ago, an embedded Linux for mobile devices: “I doubt Microsoft would ever release something that could be traced back to Linux, but if I recall correctly, Transmeta’s Midori had some rudimentary ‘cloud computing’ features vaguely similar to Microsoft’s Midori.”

FIREFOX vs OPERA vs INTERNT EXPLORER Picture Comparison..funny but true

Firefox 3 vs. Opera 9.5


Firefox 3 vs. Opera 9.5
18 Jun, 2008 Posted by Tal in Applications, Internet, Reviews, Security

Over the last few years, Mozilla has taken quite a large slice of the internet browser market. Its community-developed Firefox, is now already in its 3rd version, which has been released today. Firefox has been praised for its security features, and often declared safer than Microsoft’s Internet Explorer by security experts. The new Firefox boasts, in addition to a comprehensive redesign of its looks and a host of new features, several new security enhancements which promise to make it even more secure.

But Firefox isn’t the only player in the web browser game. Another recent player is Opera. Actually, it’s not new, per se. Several years ago, before Firefox’s breakthrough into the market, Opera was a paid browser. Later, Opera released an ad-supported free version, and then finally released a fully free version, without any advertising whatsoever, in order to try and capture a larger market share. The release of various beta versions of Firefox 3 took most of the attention of the media, however, and the news about the release of the new 9.5 version of Opera was overlooked. Along with an update of its appearance, the addition of several new gadgets and features, and speed optimization, Opera added a security feature which is very similar to one offered by Firefox 3; both of these enhancements will be described later in this article.

So, is Opera a real player in the browser scene? Can it beat the unbeatable? Let’s find out.

Firefox 3 is a major update to the successful Firefox 2. The interface has been redesigned, and even with the default skin it looks pretty good, and has sleek animations. Notable interface updates include: a redesigned Download Manager that includes an information bar in the browser window; the ability to tag bookmarks; the ability to save open tabs for the next session; Add-On download manager (download add-ons without visiting Mozilla’s site); and many more features. Also, it has undergone tweaking to enhance its speed, and Mozilla claims that it’s now twice as fast as Firefox 2 when loading applications like Gmail. However, I didn’t notice any visible improvement. Major new security features include complex anti-phishing tools - Firefox 3 will hide the content of web pages that are suspected forgeries and warn you when entering pages that distribute malware, using an online database of known sites that was created by Google and StopBadware.org. Also, Firefox 3 gives you easy access to SSL certificates (which are presented in an easy-to-read manner) by clicking near the address bar with your mouse.

Firefox 3 with its new History Search feature, which searches addresses by keywords.

Opera’s new feature list is not as impressive, but it does offer several new features and gadgets, such as the Quick Find, which allows you to search for a website that you have visited over the last few days. Other new features include the ability to swap links and favorites between your Opera cellphone browser and your PC Opera, and a new browser engine that’s supposed to be much quicker than the old one. Opera also added a major security feature, which is similar to that offered by Firefox: the Fraud & Malware protection uses an online database to find a list of ‘bad sites’ and protect you from going to them. Unlike Firefox, that list is maintained by HauteSecure, which is a professional company, and the database is supported by the user community (description of ‘bad sites’, addition of new entries, etc).

But how do previous versions of Firefox and Opera rank against current versions, in terms of security? You’d be surprised by the results. According to Secunia, as of May 2008, Firefox 2.x.x has 23 security vulnerabilities, out of which 3 remain unfixed. Compared to this, Opera 9.x has 14 security vulnerabilities, with all fixed. Internet Explorer ranks last, with 9 out of 28 vulnerabilities that remain unfixed.

As for performance, previous versions of Firefox were known for their heavy resource usage, especially when operating with many extensions. Load times took literally tens of seconds, and the memory consumption often went above the 100mb mark on my machine. Firefox 3 claims to have improved this, but in fact, I had higher memory consumption than I had in Firefox 2. With 5 open websites (in tabs) and not a lot of extensions, Firefox 3 takes up more than 160mb of memory, which is a significant amount. With the same pages open, however, Opera used only 98mb of memory.

So, Opera proves to be a better performer than Firefox, and it feels faster while loading pages, too. To confirm this, I ran 2 different tests to check the rendering speed of web pages (that is, how fast a browser processes a certain type of code). First, I ran the CSS Benchmark Test by nontroppo. I ran the test 5 times on each browser. Firefox 3 took an average of 269ms to complete the test, while Opera excelled at 178ms average. Internet Explorer came last with 434ms average. Next, I ran the Javascript test by Celtic Kane. Again, I did 5 tests with each browser - Firefox again was second with 303ms, Opera first with 203ms, and Internet Explorer last with a whooping 1931ms, which is almost 2 seconds. On startup, Opera felt a bit faster than Firefox, but that wasn’t too big of a difference.

Opera’s interface, with the new Quick Dial feature.

When it comes to interface, it’s very much a personal choice. Opera doesn’t have community developed extensions, but many extensions that are common on Firefox, such as Adblock, are already built into Opera, which contributes to its speed. I also liked some of Opera’s cool features, such as the Speed Dial feature (when opening a new tab, instead of a blank page you get a choice of 9 of your most favorite pages to choose from), and the built-in IRC client.

In summary, unless you are an extension addict, you should give Opera 9.5 a try. It will surprise you. It’s faster and lighter than Firefox, and promises to be more secure. Unfortunately, unlike Firefox, Opera doesn’t have the huge database of community-made extensions, which is one of its on